SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 504 | Next

Yingshu Li, My T. Thai, and Weili Wu

"Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications"


Event Query Batching to Conserve Power
As a second example of the benefit of power-aware optimization, we consider
the optimization of the query:
ON EVENT e(nodeid)
SELECT a1
FROM sensors AS s
WHERE s.nodeid = e.nodein
SAMPLE INTERVAL d FOR k
This query will cause an instance of the internal query (SELECT ...) to be
started every time the event e occurs. The internal query samples results at
every d seconds for a duration of k seconds, at which point it stops running.
Note that, by the semantics formulated above, it is possible for multiple instances
of the internal query to be running at the same time. If enough such
queries are running simultaneously, the benefit of event-based queries (e.g. not
having to poll for results) will be outweighed by the fact that each instance of
the query consumes significant energy sampling and delivering (independent)
results. To alleviate the burden of running multiple copies of the same identical
query, we employ a multi-query optimization technique based on rewriting.
To do this, we convert external events (of type e) into a stream of events, and
rewrite the entire set of independent internal queries as a sliding window join
between events and sensors, with a window size of k seconds on the event
stream, and no window on the sensor stream. For example:
SELECT a1
FROM sensors AS s
WHERE s.nodeid = e.nodein
SAMPLE INTERVAL d FOR k
The advantage of this approach is that only one query runs at a time no
matter how frequently the events of type e are triggered.


Pages:
492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516